Skip to main content
Home verified result edition

VERIFIED RESULT EDITION

2026-09-30

This dated ledger preserves the published selections alongside their original analysis, stated risk, and recorded outcome.

Results and original analysis

RANK 1 · Chicago White Sox @ Houston AstrosLOSS

Houston Astros · published price -147

Relevant score: CWS 7, HOU 3 Final

Original analysis

ESPN confirms Sean Burke versus Hunter Brown. Brown supplies the cleanest starter-quality edge on the slate: same-day analysis shows a 2.27 September xFIP, nearly 13 K/9 and a ground-ball rate above 62%, while Burke's September underlying profile carried materially more walk and regression risk. Houston used substantial bullpen volume in Game 1, but its primary late leverage arms were not severely overextended, while Chicago closer Grant Taylor worked 2.1 innings. -147 implies approximately 59.5%; the model assigns Houston approximately 62.0% fair win probability, producing approximately +4.2% expected return per unit risk. The ML is preferred to Houston -1.5 because postseason one-run and bullpen-margin risk remain meaningful.

Risk: Chicago won Game 1, Burke owns a strong 3.34 season ERA, and Houston's eight-pitcher Game 1 usage increases middle-relief uncertainty if Brown fails to provide length. Chicago's power can erase the starting-pitching edge quickly, so the run line is rejected despite its larger payout.

Result note: Chicago White Sox defeated Houston 7-3. Houston ML -147 loses. Hunter Brown allowed four first-inning runs, directly invalidating the card's primary starter-edge thesis; Bryan Abreu later allowed Chase Meidroth's three-run homer, so bullpen containment also failed.

RANK 2 · Boston Red Sox @ New York YankeesWIN

New York Yankees · published price -136

Relevant score: BOS 2, NYY 9 Final

Original analysis

ESPN confirms Sonny Gray versus Max Fried. Both starters qualify as high-end run-prevention arms, but Fried's contact-suppression profile, Boston's recent offensive weakness and Roman Anthony's hand/wrist uncertainty shift the full-game side toward New York. Aaron Judge's absence materially reduces New York's ceiling, which is why the ML is preferred to -1.5 and why the low total is not treated as a clean directional substitute. -136 implies approximately 57.6%; the model assigns New York approximately 60.5% fair win probability, an estimated +5.0% expected return per unit risk.

Risk: Gray finished 18-5 with a 2.72 ERA and is capable of neutralizing New York deep into the game. Judge is unavailable, Boston was 46-35 on the road, and a low-scoring playoff game raises one-run variance; these factors block a run-line upgrade.

Result note: New York defeated Boston 9-2. Yankees ML -136 wins. Max Fried held Boston to three hits over six innings and New York broke the game open with a six-run sixth, validating the starter/run-prevention thesis and the decision to use ML rather than -1.5.

RANK 3 · Philadelphia Phillies @ Atlanta BravesLOSS

Atlanta Braves · published price -102

Relevant score: PHI 4, ATL 3 Final/10

Original analysis

ESPN confirms Cristopher Sanchez versus Tyler Mahle. Sanchez owns the stronger full-season surface profile, but the recent-skills audit penalizes his September run-prevention regression, while Mahle posted a 1.99 ERA and sub-1.00 WHIP across nine starts after joining Atlanta. The bullpen-chain comparison favors Atlanta after Philadelphia extended Jhoan Duran in Game 1 and again exposed a season-long late-inning weakness, while Atlanta enters with the cleaner available relief chain. -102 implies approximately 50.5%; the model assigns Atlanta approximately 54.5% fair win probability, an estimated +7.9% expected return per unit risk. ML is preferred because the total carries conflicting signals from the strong starters, warm Atlanta environment and asymmetric bullpen risk.

Risk: Sanchez is still an elite ground-ball/strikeout starter capable of carrying Philadelphia deep enough to bypass its bullpen weakness. Philadelphia faces elimination and has enough power to flip the game with one swing; the matchup remains close to a true coin flip despite the modeled edge.

Result note: Philadelphia defeated Atlanta 4-3 in 10 innings. Braves ML -102 loses. Tyler Mahle delivered seven innings with one earned run and Atlanta led 3-1 after seven, validating the starter-side component, but the projected bullpen-chain advantage failed when Philadelphia tied the game on back-to-back eighth-inning homers and Alec Bohm hit the winning homer in the 10th.

RANK 4 · Chicago Cubs @ San Diego PadresWIN

San Diego Padres · published price -150

Relevant score: CHC 1, SD 4 Final

Original analysis

ESPN confirms Kevin Gausman versus Nick Pivetta. Pivetta returned from the elbow injury with a 1.45 ERA over four September starts, and San Diego's primary bullpen is unusually well positioned after Michael King supplied seven innings in Game 1. Gausman posted a 4.83 ERA in nine starts after joining Chicago and recently dealt with a shoulder issue. -150 implies 60.0%; after small-sample regression on Pivetta and the Cubs' superior full-season offense, the model retains only about 61.5% fair probability, approximately +2.5% expected return per unit risk. The edge is below the preferred normal threshold, so the full-slate rule designates this FORCED. ML is safer than -1.5, while the total has too much competing starter-regression and low-number risk.

Risk: Pivetta's post-injury sample is only four starts, Chicago led MLB with 850 regular-season runs, and Gausman owns a strong career history against San Diego. The -150 price leaves little error tolerance; this is the weakest official selection on the card and should not be interpreted as equivalent to the top three.

Result note: San Diego defeated Chicago 4-1. Padres ML -150 wins. Five San Diego pitchers combined to hold Chicago to five hits and Gavin Sheets supplied a two-run pinch-hit homer. The choice of ML rather than -1.5 reduced unnecessary margin risk, but the morning selection was FORCED and the win does not retroactively convert it into a normal qualifying edge.

Unresolved carryover

No unresolved items are carried forward from this edition.

Independent score references

The links below are independent scoreboards for the date shown. They provide game-score context only; they do not verify this archive’s frozen published prices, selection timing, or original analysis.